<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>CRM Forum Topic: Advanced find for greater than and less than</title>
<link>http://forum.crmreports.com/</link>
<description>User-to-user CRM related forums</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>UG Bot on "Advanced find for greater than and less than"</title>
<link>http://forum.crmreports.com/topic/advanced-find-for-greater-than-and-less-than#post-779</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>UG Bot</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">779@http://forum.crmreports.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;em&#62;Newsgroup subject: workaround for text field advanced find for greater than and less&#60;br /&#62;
Archived from: microsoft.public.crm&#60;br /&#62;
Author: Steve Luc&#60;/em&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Does anyone have a good suggestion for working around the limitation of Advanced Finds that will not do a Greater than and Less than of a text field?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We created a field to track a person's birth day, month and year as a varchar.  If we went with int, the field will be formatted with a comma, which just looks bad on years.  We took this approach so it would be easier to find all July birthdates.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Now we need a list of everyone between 25 and 50.  Are we forced to use a 25 row advanced find, grouped with or?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks,&#60;br /&#62;
--&#60;br /&#62;
Steve Luc&#60;br /&#62;
Senior Consultant&#60;br /&#62;
InfoGrow Corp&#60;br /&#62;
(330)929-1353 x222
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
